New England has re-signed long snapper
The Patriots also had the option of tendering Aiken at one of three different price levels – Right of First Refusal, Second-Rounder, or First-Rounder – which would have, at the very least, tripled Aiken’s base salary from last season (that figure was around half a million dollars).
If they’d done so and another club wanted to sign Aiken, the Patriots could either have matched the deal and kept Aiken (at the “Right of First Refusal” tender level) or not matched and allowed Aiken to walk away without receiving compensation from the other team. At the second- and first-round levels, the contract price for Aiken would have increased dramatically, but would have given the Patriots either a second- or first-round pick in exchange from any other club that signed Aiken.
However, it was unlikely that another team would have wanted a long snapper so badly that they would have been willing to part with a second- or first-round pick. Which meant New England would have been on the hook for an exorbitant salary for their long snapper, even at the lowest tender level (Right of First Refusal). It would also have been risky for New England to triple Aiken’s salary in order to safeguard against losing him with Right of First Refusal.
In the end, both sides apparently agreed that a one-year deal would be more than sufficient for the player and the club.
Meanwhile, another ESPN report suggests that the team has begun discussions with free-agent-to-be wide receiver